Open Access

Comparison of Organic and In-organic Phase Change Materials on Curing Time and Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Bricks in Passive Solar Dryers

Jeevan Ashok kumar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Anna University, Madurai, TN, India Sattanathan Muthuvel, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Srivilliputhur, TN, India Ranjitharamasamy Sudhakarapandian, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, TN, India Gopinath Govindan Radhakrishnan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, M. Kumarasamy College of Engineering, Karur, TN, India Muthiah Muthukannan muthukannan_research@rediffmail.com
Department of Civil Engineering, KCG College of Technology, Chennai, TN, India


J. Environ. Nanotechnol., Volume 14, No 1 (2025) pp. 379-388

https://doi.org/10.13074/jent.2025.03.2441118

PDF


Abstract

Conventionally, phase change materials (PCM) are used as energy storage materials for latent and sensible heat in solar applications. PCM are generally classified as organic and inorganic. In this work, an organic PCM like paraffin wax and an inorganic PCM like manganese chloride tetrahydrate have been compared in terms of curing time and mechanical properties of Geopolymer bricks (GPB) obtained from fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, Rice husk ash, and Nano silica, which are a target in construction industries for their reliable properties, when compared to conventional cement and sand bricks. The novelty of this work is to use an inorganic PCM in a Solar dryer to cure GPB, find its effect on the mechanical properties of GPB, and finally compare it with Organic PCM. It has been experimentally observed that GPB in Solar dryers with Inorganic PCM shows higher curing time, lesser compressive strength, lesser tensile strength, and lesser flexural strength when compared to GPB in Solar dryers with Organic PCM. The present study was also performed using ANSYS simulation software to correlate with experimental values. Simulation results predict a significant variation from experimental values, demanding more accuracy in simulation modeling. In conclusion, organic PCM performs better than inorganic PCM based on curing time, properties, and cost of the GPB in applications like construction, structural, and buildings.

Full Text

Reference


Albitar, M., Visintin, P., Mohamed, A. M. S. and Drechsler, M., Assessing behaviour of fresh and hardened geopolymer concrete mixed with class-F fly ash, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 19(5), 1445–1455(2015).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-1254-z

Al-Yasiri, Q. and Szabo, M., Paraffin As a Phase Change Material to Improve Building Performance: An Overview of Applications and Thermal Conductivity Enhancement Techniques, Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain., 6, 1-13(2021).

https://doi.org/10.1051/rees/2021040

Bharath, R. G., Naveen, K. G., Manjeet Kharub, Cryogenic processing of AISI P20 tool steel: Evaluation of mechanical properties and microstructure, Mater. Today Proc., (2023).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.274

Bharathiraja, R., Ramkumar, T., Selvakumar, M. and Radhika, N., Thermal characteristics enhancement of Paraffin Wax Phase Change Material (PCM) for thermal storage applications, Renewable Energy, 222, 119986(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.119986

Capossio, J. P., Fabani, M. P., Reyes-Urrutia, A., Torres-Sciancalepore, R., Deng, Y., Baeyens, J., Rodriguez, R. and Mazza, G., Sustainable Solar Drying of Brewer’s Spent Grains: A Comparison with Conventional Electric Convective Drying, Proc., 10(2), 339(2022).

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020339

Chen, K., Liu, Q., Chen, B., Zhang, S., Ferrara, L. and Li, W., Effect of raw materials on the performance of 3D printing geopolymer: A review, J. Build. Eng., 84, 108501(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108501

Deb, P. S., Prabir, K. S. and Salim, B., Effects of nano-silica on the strength development of geopolymer cured at room temperature, Constr. Build. Mater., 101(1), 675–683(2015).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.044

Emrani, A. and Berrada, A., A comprehensive review on techno-economic assessment of hybrid energy storage systems integrated with renewable energy, J. Energy Storage, 84(8), 111010(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.111010

Fort, J. and Cerny, R., Transition to circular economy in the construction industry: Environmental aspects of waste brick recycling scenarios, Waste Manage., 118, 510–520(2020).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.004

Frahat, N. B., Awed, A. S., Kassem, S. M., Abdel, M. M. I. A. and Mohamed, O. I. O., Innovative shielding solutions by geopolymer paste and fly ash as effective substitution of cement materials for sustainable protection, J. Build. Eng., 87, 108977(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108977

Ismail, A., Bahmani, M., Chen, X. and Wang, J., An organic-inorganic hybrid microcapsule of phase change materials for thermal energy storage in cementitious composites, Constr. Build. Mater., 416, 135289(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135289

Jeevan, A. K., Sattanathan, M., Issac, S. R. V., Ramoni, M., Shanmugam, R. and Ranjitharamasamy, S. P., Mechanical Properties Comparison of Geo Polymer Brick Dried by Electrical and Passive Solar Devices With Phase Change Material (Paraffin Wax), Processes, 12(1), 28(2023).

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12010028

Jeevanantham, S., Seeniappan, K. L. Natrayan, and M., Muthukannan, Influence of peanut husk derived heat-treated Si3N4 on load bearing properties of basalt fibre-reinforced polyester composite, J. Aust. Ceram. Soc., 1-13(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-024-01104-9

Juhola, S., Laurila, A., Groundstroem, F. and Klein, J., Climate risks to the renewable energy sector: Assessment and adaptation within energy companies, Bus. Strat. Env., 33(3), 1906–1919(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3580

Kaliappan, S., Paranthaman, V., Kamal, M. D. R., Avv, S. and Muthukannan, M., A Novel Approach of Particle Swarm and ANT Colony Optimization for Task Scheduling in Cloud, In: 2024 14th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science and Engineering (Confluence), Noida, India, 2024 14th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), 272–278 (2024a).,

https://doi.org/10.1109/Confluence60223.2024.10463398

Min, K. E., Jang, J. W., Kim, J. K., Wern, C. and Yi, S., Thermophysical Properties of Inorganic Phase-Change Materials Based on MnCl2·4H2O, Appl. Sci., 12(13), 6338(2022).

https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136338

Mostafa, S. A., El-Gamal, S. M. A., Mohsen, A., Ramadan, M., Wetwet, M. M., Deghiedy, N. M., Swilem, A. E., and Hazem, M. M., Towards a green climate: Production of slag–red brick waste-based geopolymer mingled with WO₃ nanoparticles with bio-mechanical achievements. Constr. Buil. Mater., 13, 134909(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134909

Partheeban, P., Jegadeesan, V., Manimuthu, S. and Chella G. C., Cleaner production of geopolymer bricks using Solar-LPG hybrid dryer, J. Cleaner Prod., 442, 141048(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141048

Ramachandran, A., Venkatasubramani, R., Venkataraman, S. and Rangan, B. V., Modified guidelines for geopolymer concrete mix design using Indian standard, Artic. Asian J. Civ. Eng,, 13, 353–364(2012).

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2187-6_123

Ramesh, V., Karthik, K., Arunkumar, K., Unnam, N.K., Ganesh, R. and Rajkumar, C., Effect of sawdust filler with Kevlar/basalt fiber on the mechanical properties epoxy–based polymer composite materials, Mater. Today Proc., 72, 2225-2230(2023).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.208

Selvakanmani, S., Seeniappan, K. and Muthukannan, M., Recognition of Cyber Physical Systems Through Network Security for Wireless Sensor Networks: Using Artificial InItelligence in Cyber Physical Systems. In Intelligent Solutions for Sustainable Power Grids, Global Sci. Publ. Int. Acad., 272-286(2024).

https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3735-6

Siba, S. C. and Shyamal, G., A comprehensive review on the factors influencing engineering characteristics of lightweight geopolymer concrete, J. Build. Eng., 86, 108887(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108887

Singh, P., Vikas, M., Natrayan, L., Kandukuri, S. Seeniappan, K., Muthiah, M. and Gopinath, R., Prediction of groundwater contamination in an open landfill area using a novel hybrid clustering-based AI model Environ. Prot. Eng., 50(1), (2024).

https://doi.org/10.37190/epe240106

Tripathi, A. K., Aruna, M., Elumalai, P. V., Karthik, K., Khan, S. A., Asif, M. and Rao, K. S., Advancing Solar PV panel power prediction: A comparative machine learning approach in fluctuating environmental conditions, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 59, 104459(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.104459

Vega, M., Marín, P. E., Ushak, S. and Shire, S., Research trends and gaps in experimental applications of phase change materials integrated in buildings, J. Energy Storage, 75, 109746(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109746

Vellattu, C. R. K., Ozhukka, P. F., Panakkal, T., Meethale, C. B., Kumari, P. and Valiya, P. S., Clean technology for sustainable development by geopolymer materials, Phy. Sci. Rev., 9(1), 327–342(2024).

https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2022-0194

Yilmazer, P. B., Numerical Analysis of Double Geopolymer Concrete Layer with Different Properties, Int. J. Innovative Eng. Appl., 7(2), 195–200(2023).

https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1382611

Contact Us

Powered by

Powered by OJS